Pro Choice Folks Are The Real Science Deniers
The pro choice people are unable to provide logical responses when it comes to justifying the killing of a baby in the womb. The pro life person’s argument is that pro choice people fail to see the flaw in their logic. This is because, pro choice people fail to realize that an unborn baby also deserves bodily autonomy. Pro choice people also deny the science that proves that the unborn baby is a human since he or she comes from their mother’s uterus which means that they deserve at least bodily autonomy just like pro choice advocates say pro life should be granted, but pro choice people will not grant pro life advocates this right.
If pro choice advocates are so pro bodily autonomy, then they should not be able to stand up against pro life people because pro life people also want bodily autonomy for the baby. Pro choice advocates cannot use pro bodily autonomy as their defense when it comes to abortion because pro life advocates can easily turn that argument around on them by saying that babies have the right to their own bodies just like pro choice people believe pro life advocates do not have the right to their own bodies either. If pro choice people admit that pro life advocates deserve bodily autonomy, then they are admitting that pro abortion is wrong which means they are contradicting themselves.
This logic is an example of a logical fallacy called guilt by association. This fallacy happens when someone accuses another person of being wrong due to the person’s association with other people who are wrong. This pro choice argument also commits a logical fallacy called affirming the consequent where if pro choice advocates admit that pro life advocates deserve bodily autonomy, then they must be saying that pro abortion is wrong which means pro choice advocates supposedly contradict their own beliefs because pro life advocates believe pro abortion is wrong.
This pro choice argument also commits a logical fallacy called ad hominem which happens when someone criticizes or rejects another person’s statement by insulting or belittling them instead of providing evidence to refute their claim. This pro death argument claims that pro life advocates make “stupid” claims and accuse pro lifers of being immoral rather than proving how killing unborn babies is morally acceptable.